
These legal challenges created uncertainty and slowed progress on what is now a critical infrastructure project in the Kashmir region.
Long legal battle
Since 2008-09, various PILs were filed, questioning the project's parameters. Officials from Northern Railway noted that while work continued, it became sluggish due to the ongoing legal proceedings.These challenges persisted until 2016, when the Delhi High Court accepted the railways' position, followed by a Supreme Court ruling three months later that disposed of the pending cases.
This legal resolution allowed the construction to move forward at full capacity after July 2016.
Impact of court rulings
The intervention of the courts was crucial. Before the rulings, a committee led by E. Sreedharan raised concerns regarding the proposed alignment of the railway line.To counter these challenges, the Centre appointed additional solicitor general Maninder Singh to argue in favour of the project. A former official from Northern Railway remarked, “The project would have been completed early had there not been these court cases.”
The Railway Board's affidavit, submitted as directed by the high court, confirmed that all necessary safety measures were satisfied regarding the railway line and the bridge. The court concluded that the existing alignment and the bridge over the Chenab were secure.
With the legal battles behind them, the focus shifted back to construction, marking a significant milestone in enhancing connectivity for the region. The bridge stands as a testament to the resilience of the railway project amid adversity, promising improved transport links in the Kashmir valley.
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.
Read More News on
(Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.